28May2015

We Might Have Major Problems Making Space Babies

The most exciting next(ish) step in space exploration is surely to set up a human colony on Mars (or maybe Venus). Plenty of people are interested in a one-way ticket. It’s past speculation!

But if the colony is to be permanently successful, a big issue will need to be addressed: How do we make babies beyond the Earth? Even long-term spaceflight offers potential opportunities to engage in reproduction, but all the science so far indicates that it might not be a good idea.

Unexpected Problems

For Motherboard at Vice, Daniel Oberhaus delves into the reasons that we should consider keeping the kibosh on baby making in space. When we’ve studied the effects of microgravity on foetal development in rats, geckos, sea urchins and even birds, viability was usually lower and sometimes unusual abnormalities cropped up. Also, there’s a concern that space pregnancy could be taxing for the women carrying the babies.

Why are we thinking about it at all? Oberhaus writes:The risk of pregnancy in space isn’t idle speculation: between 1989 and 2006, seven pregnancies were documented at Australian Antarctic research stations, an environment which is frequently used as a space analog due to its isolation. It’s a staggering number and suggests that dangerous environs alone aren’t significant deterrents for their horny inhabitants.

As a result NASA’s official policy forbids pregnancy in space. Female astronauts are tested regularly in the 10 days prior to launch. And sex in space is very much frowned upon. So far the have been no confirmed instances of coitus, though lots of speculation.

Even if NASA and other space agencies have seriously considered the idea of investigating the pros and cons of sex in space, it may have taken the back burner to more pressing mission goals. Astronaut Ron Garan confirmed in a 2012 Reddit AMA that the ISS does have space for astronauts to find some “quiet time” should they need it.

For Motherboard, Daniel Oberhaus asked Garan to clarify. “I can only speak for myself, but we’re professionals,” he said. “It’s in the realm of what is possible, but the missions are so busy and intense, that it’s normal to just focus on the mission.”A Series Of ImplicationsEven if the free time came up, NASA may have scrapped the idea in favour of keeping the group cohesive.

A Tangled Web

Paul Root Wolpe, the Director of Emory University’s Centre for Ethics and a senior bioethicist at NASA, explains: The ethical issues [of taking sex to space] are not so much around the act itself, but the implications. There’s a whole series of questions we’d want to ask about what it would mean to actually have two members of the crew actually have sex in space in terms of what their relationship would be and what their relationship would be in relation to the other crew members. How would it affect people psychologically?

While those questions haven’t been answered yet, they will be in future long term missions—especially if humans set out to colonize another planet. Even the effects of Mars’ slightly lower gravity may be a cause for concern Genetic Diversity IssuesBut that pales in comparison to the challenge of keeping genetic diversity rich enough for the colonists to survive.

According to Portland State University anthropologist Cameron Smith, the ideal number of colonists needed to maintain near 100 percent genetic diversity is between 10,000 and 40,000, reports Oberhaus. That’s a lot of bodies to move to Mars.  Smithsonian

 

Read previous post:
What Are Black Holes?

Black holes are some of the strangest and most fascinating...

rp_stephen-hawking-via-NASA-HQ-photo-on-flickr-creative-commons-license-800x430.jpg
Hawking: Aliens “Almost Certain” & Could Invade Earth

After three years working on a new television series for...

Advanced Alien Civilizations Possible In 50 Galaxies

Advanced alien life is possible in 50 galaxies, astronomers have...

Close