NASA Designing a Comet Harpoon

NASA don't want to rope a comet; they're trying to design a harpoon instead.

Comets are a source of endless fascination for astronomers. Those frozen balls of ice and dust could hold key information about the origin of the planets in our solar system, and of life itself. That might explain why NASA s

cientists are developing a giant harpoon, intended to be deployed from a hovering spacecraft and take a sample from a moving comet.

Why does NASA need such thing? It’s tough to land on an icy body that is both rotating and hurtling through space at 150,000 miles per hour. “A spacecraft wouldn’t actually land on a comet; it would have to attach itself somehow, probably with some kind of harpoon,” according to NASA comet scientist Joseph Nuth. “So we figured if you have to use a harpoon anyway, you might as well get it to collect your sample.”

Indeed, the European Space Agency’s Rosetta mission is equipped with a harpoon to attach a probe to a comet’s surface. But it’s not designed to collect a sample. Instead, it will tether a small probe to the comet, allowing on-board instruments to conduct in situ analysis.

And NASA’s OSIRIS-REx mission can collect a sample from an asteroid’s surface, but not the subsurface. This latest project will build on these previous designs to sample the interior of a comet.

The latest NASA prototype  relies in part on a six-foot crossbow, positioned to fire vertically downward into a 55-gallon drum of “cometary simulant” — basically a mix of sand, salt, and pebbles intended to simulate the surface of a comet. A crossbow is simply a bow with a stock and trigger mechanism, so you can “cock” the weapon like a rifle before launching your chosen projectile at a target.

Why a crossbow? It’s an excellent means of launching a projectile, that’s why! I’ll let the explanation that follows explain:


Lasooing or harpooning one of these monsters is on the drawing boards. Image via Wikipedia

If you press down on a spring, it expands to its original shape when you let go. The same thing happens if you pull its ends in opposite directions. This is because of the spring’s elastic potential energy — the energy it stores because of a change in its shape. When you pull one end of a spring, it stores elastic potential energy until you let go.

Its potential energy then becomes kinetic energy, the energy of movement, allowing the spring to resume its normal shape and sometimes to bounce around.

This is exactly what happens when you draw a bow. … [A]s you pull the string toward your ear, you pull the tips of the bow’s limbs toward you and closer together — your strength changes the bow’s shape.

When you let go, the bow springs back to its original shape and the bowstring moves back to its original position. The movement and energy propel the arrow from the bow at high speed.

The NASA prototype uses an electric winch to pull back the bowstring. The winch can be precisely adjusted via a dial to generate just the right amount of force to penetrate the target material. The projectile can reach speeds as high as 100 feet per second.

And apparently it packs a killer recoil. “We had to bolt it to the floor, because the recoil made the whole testbed jump after every shot,” Donald Wegel, NASA’s lead engineer on the project, said in the press release.

This is where the harpoon part of the apparatus comes into play. Fans of Moby Dick will recall that a harpoon is a long spear with a barbed detachable head on some kind of fishing line.

In the case of whales, it’s usually a thick rope or chain, given the size of the prey. The barbed head is launched from the harpoon (much like a crossbow) and penetrates the skin and thick layers of whale blubber, embedding itself in the flesh. This lets the whalers drag their prey back to their ship.

NASA is going for something a bit more sophisticated, of course. They don’t want to rope a comet; they’re trying to design a harpoon head that will pull out a sample of the comet’s interior. That means designing a special hollowed-out tip, as well as a sample collection chamber that fits inside that tip.

The chamber must open at the point of impact, as the tip penetrates the comet’s surface, in order to collect the sample, and then close tightly and detach from the tip — which will remain embedded in the comet — so it can be pulled back into the spacecraft.

Because there really is no existing data for this kind of thing, the team is currently experimenting in the lab with lots of different kinds of materials likely to be found on a comet’s surface — a list that does not include whale blubber.

“The surface could be soft and fluffy, mostly made up of dust, or it could be ice mixed with pebbles, or even solid rock,” Wegel explained. “Most likely, there will be areas with different compositions, so we need to design a harpoon that’s capable of penetrating a reasonable range of materials.”

They also need to determine the optimal amount of powder charge to ensure the harpoon doesn’t bounce off the comet’s surface or — yowza! — go all the way through. The lab prototype is designed to do just that. Said Nuth, “Bringing back a comet sample will also let us analyze it with advanced instruments that won’t fit on a spacecraft or haven’t been invented yet.”Source: Discovery Science


Australia joins the fight against space junk

Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd said Australia, like all nations, depends more and more on space-based infrastructure for its security, prosperity and lifestyle.

Australia is backing a proposal to minimise the amount of ‘space junk’ circling the planet.

The plan has been put forward by the EU, and calls for an international code of conduct for outer space activities.

The code will aim to prevent both accidental and deliberate damage to satellites and other space objects, which creates long-lived debris and poses risks for crucial space-based infrastructure.

Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd said Australia, like all nations, depends more and more on space-based infrastructure for its security, prosperity and lifestyle.

“Everything from aircraft and ship navigation, to electronic commerce, communications, climate monitoring and disaster management, not to mention many of our defence systems, all rely on satellites,” said Mr Rudd.

“But all that’s being put at risk by the growing possibility of collisions with satellites and space vehicles.”

The situation is made more urgent by the fact that several countries are developing weapons systems designed to destroy satellites.

While there is still work to be done, the Australian government believes a code of conduct is the best approach to tackle this complex issue, and so has given the proposal in-principle support and will actively engage in negotiations to finalise a deal.

Current estimates suggest there are around 500,000 pieces of long-lived orbiting space debris large enough to seriously damage or destroy satellites or human space flights. Source: SpaceMart




Read previous post:
What Happens When The Sun Dies?

What Happens When The Sun Dies? Our solar system is...

Fact/Help Sheets

    I Bought A Telescope - What Now? Have...

What To Do When Stuff Falls From The Sky

What To Do When Stuff Falls From The Sky In...